<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Newdorf Legal &#187; Lawyers &amp; The Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newdorf.com/category/lawyers-and-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newdorf.com</link>
	<description>California Litigation Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Race, Gender, Jury Selection and David Mamet</title>
		<link>http://www.newdorf.com/jury-strategies-for-hot-button-issues?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=jury-strategies-for-hot-button-issues</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdorf.com/jury-strategies-for-hot-button-issues#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Newdorf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers & The Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Mamet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jury pool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jury selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdorf.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Juries try their best to decide cases based on the facts and the law. They don&#8217;t always succeed. Effective lawyers understand the limits of juror fairness and their ability to put aside preconceived notions. David Mamet&#8217;s play Race, which I saw this week in San Francisco, is a perceptive look at how trial lawyers navigate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdorf.com/jury-strategies-for-hot-button-issues/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco business attorney David Newdorf helps obtain ruling from California Supreme Court that will save business and governments billions annually.</title>
		<link>http://www.newdorf.com/cal-supreme-court-decision-saves-business-billions?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cal-supreme-court-decision-saves-business-billions</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdorf.com/cal-supreme-court-decision-saves-business-billions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Newdorf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers & The Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California business attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco business litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Franciso lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdorf.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO (August 18, 2011 ) – The California Supreme Court ruled this week that court awards to accident victims for past medical expenses must be limited to the amounts actually paid and accepted as payment in full by medical care providers. The case pitted personal injury lawyers against doctors, hospitals, local government and insurers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdorf.com/cal-supreme-court-decision-saves-business-billions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened To Heller Ehrman &#8212; And Who&#8217;s Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.newdorf.com/what-happened-to-heller-ehrman-and-whos-next?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-happened-to-heller-ehrman-and-whos-next</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdorf.com/what-happened-to-heller-ehrman-and-whos-next#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Newdorf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers & The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdorf.com/lawyers-and-law/what-happened-to-heller-ehrman-and-whos-next</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until very recently, Heller Ehrman LLP was a mainstay of the San Francisco legal community.  Today it is gone.  Virtually overnight, a firm that in 2007 grossed $471 million and spun off $1 million in profits per partner has vanished.  I’m not an alarmist by nature, but what happened at Heller – just a block from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdorf.com/what-happened-to-heller-ehrman-and-whos-next/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Every Litigator Can Learn from the Four Stages of a Marathon</title>
		<link>http://www.newdorf.com/marathon-lessons-for-litigators?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=marathon-lessons-for-litigators</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdorf.com/marathon-lessons-for-litigators#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Newdorf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers & The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newdorf.com/lawyers-and-law/what-every-litigator-can-learn-from-the-four-stages-of-a-marathon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People sometimes ask me what I think about while out on long runs.  Before the sore muscles and aching joints recede into memory, I thought I’d share some of my musings from the San Francisco Marathon on August 3, 2008. It occurred to me that long-distance running and litigation have a lot in common. So [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdorf.com/marathon-lessons-for-litigators/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plaintiffs&#8217; Bill S.B. 93 Was Ill-Conceived</title>
		<link>http://www.newdorf.com/plaintiffs-bill-sb-93-was-ill-conceived?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=plaintiffs-bill-sb-93-was-ill-conceived</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdorf.com/plaintiffs-bill-sb-93-was-ill-conceived#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Newdorf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers & The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newdorf.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Bill 93 would have allowed accident victims insured by Medi-Cal (and their lawyers) to recover higher settlements and judgments.  But the rhetoric of both sides fails to explain why the resulting medical damages would have been fair &#8212; or too high, depending on one&#8217;s point of view.  Although the governor vetoed the bill (again), [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdorf.com/plaintiffs-bill-sb-93-was-ill-conceived/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guv Vetoes Plaintiffs&#8217; Grab For Higher Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.newdorf.com/guv-vetoes-higher-fees?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=guv-vetoes-higher-fees</link>
		<comments>http://www.newdorf.com/guv-vetoes-higher-fees#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Newdorf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers & The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newdorf.com/wordpress/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The plaintiffs&#8217; bar is nothing if not relentless in pursuit of its agenda &#8212; mostly higher fees. After striking out in court decisions for the past few years, the plaintiffs&#8217; bar has shifted its efforts to the political arena. Gov. Schwarzenegger vetoed one of the plaintiffs&#8217; key measures &#8212; S.B. 93 &#8212; last Friday (10/5/2007). [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newdorf.com/guv-vetoes-higher-fees/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
