Sample Deposition Questions In Personal Injury Cases
September 18, 2008 by David Newdorf
Filed under Lit Tip Of The Week:™ Practical Advice For Litigators
This week’s litigation tip expands on my article, “The Top Ten Killer Deposition Questions,” to provide ideas for basic deposition questions in a personal injury matter.
The most popular articles on this website have to do with depositions, which shows how important this discovery procedure is in today’s civil litigation practice. Based on the most recent California court statistics, between 8 and 12 percent of civil cases filed go to trial. For the other roughly 90 percent of cases that settle or resolve through a dismissal or motion, the deposition might as well be considered the trial.
Defense lawyers typically ask these questions (at least I do when defending a case involving personal injuries), so plaintiff’s lawyers should review this list with their clients during preparation for deposition. Also check out my article on “Preparing Your Client For Deposition.”
- “When did you first realize there was going to be an accident? Tell me how you knew an accident was about to happen.” This is a good opening question to set the stage.
- For trip-and-falls:
- “How did the accident happen? What happened with your foot? Did you trip? Did you slip? Did your foot catch? Did some part of your body twist?”
- “Was there any foreign substance or article on the surface where you fell? Was there anything unusual about the surface where you fell?”
- “How did you land? On what part of your body? Were you face up or face down? Which direction was your head pointed? Which direction were your feet pointed?”
- For motor vehicle accidents:
- “What did you hear right before the accident?” If the police report, photos or accident reconstruction report shows skid marks left by any vehicle, that would produce a loud, shrill noise that could be heard for blocks around.
- “Describe how your body moved during the accident.” A detailed verbal description and/or the videotape of the deposition (if used) will be useful to a retained medical doctor, chiropractor, biomechanics expert or accident reconstructionist. Sometimes the plaintiff’s description may contradict the laws of physics (such as when plaintiff says he fell backwards following a sudden bus stop) or be inconsistent with other evidence.
- “What parts of your body made contact with what parts of the interior of the vehicle (or sidewalk or floor)?” You want to compare the purported points of impact with the medical evidence of the location of cuts or bruises.
- “When did you start to hurt?”
- “Did you have any swelling? Where? When did that occur?”
- “Did you have any cuts, bruises or scrapes? Where? When did those become visible?”
- “Did anyone take any photographs at the location of the accident? Who? When? When did you see these photographs?”
- “Did anyone take photographs of your injuries?” Ideally, you should have obtained these photos in response to document demands before the deposition. Sometimes the plaintiff’s lawyer hasn’t done his or her job in gathering responsive documents, so you should always ask the plaintiff.
- “When did you first seek any medical treatment? How did you get there?” I’m always amazed how many accident victims call a lawyer before a doctor. And there was the bus fall-on-board case I defended once where the plaintiff stood up, announced he had changed his mind and “wanted to get paid,” and laid back down on the floor to wait for the paramedics. Meanwhile, he got out his cell phone and started calling law firms.
- “How did you find your doctor?” Often the lawyer has referred the client to a favored treater, who will take a lien on the case instead of payment up front. Many plaintiffs’ attorneys, however, frown on this practice.
- “How long were you at the doctor’s office for treatment?”
- “Describe your treatment.”
- “When did you last see your doctor?”
- “Did your doctor prescribe any medication?”
- “Are you currently taking any medication as a result of this accident?”
- “How are you feeling today?”
About Newdorf Legal – a California
Business Litigation Law Firm
Newdorf Legal is the go-to small firm for big problems. When business executives and public officials face complex legal challenges, they turn to David Newdorf for advice and representation. The firm’s lawyers have significant experience in the private and public sectors handling high-profile litigation. Newdorf Legal provides business and public entity clients expert advice and representation in:
- business litigation
- commercial disputes
- California breach of contract lawsuits
- business torts/interference with contract
- real property litigation
- joint venture/partnership issues
- investor lawsuits
- fraud and other civil actions
For a free copy of our informative brochure, “The Top 10 Business Litigation Mistakes . . . and how to avoid them,” contact Newdorf Legal.
For all of your litigation questions, contact Newdorf Legal, a San Francisco business litigation law firm.
Preparing Your Client For Deposition
December 2, 2007 by David Newdorf
Filed under Lit Tip Of The Week:™ Practical Advice For Litigators
Preparing your client to testify at deposition can make or break a lawsuit.
Defending your client’s deposition can be a nerve-wracking, sweaty armpit experience.At the end of the day, a weak performance or just one poor answer can sink a case. But even with stakes this high, most lawyers do not spend enough time preparing the client to testify. While the demands of your practice, your client’s calendar, or the legal budget for the case may not allow it, ideally you should spend at least two hours of preparation with the client for each anticipated hour of deposition. And sending your client home with a stack of documents to review is no substitute for the face-to-face prep session.
Here is a basic outline and some tips for your deposition preparation session with your client.
- Start with the basic procedure. Let the client know the who, what, when and where of the deposition. Who will be present? Explain the role of the court reporter. Tell the client whether the deposition will be videotaped. Explain the oath. Go over the Q & A format. Explain that you may be stating objections for the record, but that the client will have to answer the question except in the rare cases when you instruct him or her not to answer. If this is the witness’s first depo, he or she will appreciate learning about the basics. The client will likely have some anxiety and letting hime or her know what to expect will lessen the unease.
- Give a sample admonishment. Come deposition day, it is likely that the lawyer who noticed the depo will start with a standard list of “ground rules.” Explain these and let your client hear a sample admonishment during the prep session. When the client hears these same standard instructions from the opposing lawyer at the beginning of the actual deposition, she or he will think “I’m prepared for this.” That will calm any jitters and allow the client to focus on what’s important. Don’t forget to ask your client during prep about medication he or she takes. Medical conditions can be a sensitive issue, and if your client is taking prescription medication, you don’t want to the client to be surprised and embarrassed by this common question.
- Explain how the deposition fits into the end goal of “winning.” Remember: the deposition is opposing counsel’s opportunity to learn about your case. If he doesn’t do a good job, is that our problem? Of course not. At the deposition of our clients, our strategy is defensive. I often use the analogy that the depo is like a game of “20 Questions.” If the questioner doesn’t ask the right questions, he loses. But the first instinct of the client — especially if this is her first encounter with the other side — may be to attempt to: (1) persuade the other side; (2) charm the other side; (3) argue with the other side; or (4) tell her entire story. It is your job in prepping the client to get her to resist any of these common traps. Cases are not won at the client’s depo, but they can be lost. Let the client know that this isn’t the time to “tell her story.” There will be other opportunities — including arbitration, mediation or trial.
- Keep answers short. The best deposition answers — from the point-of-view of the defending side of the table — are the shortest, truthful answers. Tell your client: Don’t explain. Don’t speculate. Don’t help the opposing counsel. Explain the difference between a “guess” and an “estimate.” I use the example of the conference table: “You may not know the exact dimensions of the table in this room, but you could give an estimate. But if I asked you ‘How big is the conference table on the floor below?’ — your answer would be a guess because you’ve never been in that conference room.” (If anyone one has another favorite example, let me know. I’m always looking for fresh material.)
- The best deposition answers are the ones that answer the question directly and briefly. For example, the proper answer to the question: “Do you know what time it is?” is either “Yes” or “No” — but not “10 a.m.” Why? Because the latter answer volunteered information that was not called for by the question — a basic depo mistake. Your client may protest that the deposition will take longer that way. No one wants to spend any longer than necessary in a depo, and your client may think: “I have nothing to hide. If I just tell the lawyer everything I know, we can all get out of here sooner.” Wrong! Every volunteered tid-bit will be written down by the opposing counsel and lead to another line of questioning. Though counter intuitive to most clients, you must emphasize that shorter answers lead to shorter, better depos.
- The “perfect” answers. I tell clients that the only “perfect” depo answers (if they are truthful ones) are the following:
- “Yes.”
- “No.”
- “I don’t know.”
- “I don’t recall.”
- “Can you rephrase your question?”
As for the last answer — “please rephrase” — tell the client to never answer a question he doesn’t understand. It’s the questioner’s job to ask understandable questions, and it’s dangerous to answer a question if one doesn’t know what it means. Explain the difference between “I don’t know” and “I don’t recall.” Some witnesses will overuse these two answers because they are easy. That mistake will come come back to haunt you at trial when the client’s memory and knowledge has been miraculously restored.
- Review important documents and all prior statements. During prep, you and your client should go over all of the witness’s own prior taped or written statements on the subject of the lawsuit. Deposition testimony that is inconsistent with prior statements can lead to uncomfortable cross-examination at trial. And in prepping for the depo, don’t just give your client a stack of documents to review in his office or at home. Having the client read them on his own — if he actually does it — is better than nothing, but not much. You need to read and discuss the important documents with your client.
- Practice Q & A. This is useful and should be done. But if you anticipate that your client will be vigorously cross-examined at depo, get another lawyer to deliver the tough practice grilling. For example, O.J. Simpson’s dream team — not lacking in cross-examination skills — brought in Berkeley criminal defense maven Cris Arguedas to do the deed. Why? Because being subjected to cross-examination isn’t fun. Even knowing that this is “practice” and you’re really on his side, your client could easily resent getting the third-degree from his own lawyer.
- Don’t forget to review the “Top 10 Killer Deposition Questions” with your client. Read my list of “killer” deposition questions in last week’s Lit Tip Of The Week. And prepare for other expected tough questions.
- Videotaped depositions. If you know the deposition will be videotaped, tell your client. Instruct your client to dress in trial attire. For men, that usually means suit or jacket and tie. For women, a dress suit. If your client has any distracting mannerisms (such as resting chin on hand or not looking at the questioner), tell her what they are and to resist them while on camera. Also, if the depo will be videotaped, warn your client not to turn and look at you before answering. This gesture makes the witness look like she is looking to her lawyer to tell her what to say.
Know your case before deposition prep
Every case is different, so consider these rules as guidelines. If you have a good reason to deviate from these suggestions — go ahead. But you should at least know and understand the conventional wisdom before altering it.
About Newdorf Legal – a California
Business Litigation Law Firm
Newdorf Legal is the go-to small firm for big problems. When business executives and public officials face complex legal challenges, they turn to David Newdorf for advice and representation. The firm’s lawyers have significant experience in the private and public sectors handling high-profile litigation. Newdorf Legal provides business and public entity clients expert advice and representation in:
- business litigation
- commercial disputes
- California breach of contract lawsuits
- business torts/interference with contract
- real property litigation
- joint venture/partnership issues
- investor lawsuits
- fraud and other civil actions
For a free copy of our informative brochure, “The Top 10 Business Litigation Mistakes . . . and how to avoid them,” contact Newdorf Legal.
For all of your litigation questions, contact Newdorf Legal, a San Francisco business litigation law firm.
The Top 10 Killer Deposition Questions
November 1, 2007 by David Newdorf
Filed under Lit Tip Of The Week:™ Practical Advice For Litigators
One of the prime reasons to spend the time and money to depose an adverse witness is to gather impeachment material.
Other than hiring a private investigator to delve into the witness’s past, the deposition is the most effective tool in the lawyer’s arsenal for uncovering dirt and chipping away at credibility. That includes attacking an eye-witness account, challenging an unfavorable opinion, exposing bias, and undermining believability.
Yet most lawyers don’t ask all of the basic, open-ended questions that could help achieve their impeachment goals. In every deposition, there are questions tailored to the facts of the case, whether it is a business dispute or personal injury claim. But many (if not all) of these “killer” questions should be asked of adverse witnesses in every type of case. Many times you will strike out. That’s okay, because when you do connect with one of these questions, the result is likely to be a solid base hit – and occasionally a grand slam. The answers to these basic questions can be so damaging to the opponent’s case that the litigation will end on terms favorable to your client. And isn’t that the goal?
So here they are – the Top 10 Killer Deposition Questions
:
- “Have you ever been arrested?” (And the follow-up: “Have you ever been convicted?”) Opposing counsel may go ballistic on this one, but it is a proper question. Remember, felony convictions and any convictions for fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude are generally admissible for impeachment.
- “Have you ever been deposed before?” I ask this at the beginning of the deposition, as part of the standard admonition, when it sounds like an innocent inquiry related to the ground rules for the depo. But if the answer is ”yes,” I always follow up later with questions about the prior deposition(s). I also ask the related questions, “Have you ever testified in court?” and “Have you ever been a plaintiff or a defendant in another lawsuit?” Prior testimony and lawsuits can be a treasure trove of accusations and impeachment.
- “Have you ever seen the [plaintiff/defendant/employee] before the events related to this lawsuit?” This question may uncover connections between a supposedly independent witness and the other side.
- “Did you meet with the other side’s counsel before this deposition?” Pin down the number of meetings, where they occurred and how long they lasted. This information can help dismantle the claim of independence.
- “Have you signed any written statements/made any recorded statements/spoken to any reporters about the events related to this lawsuit?” To this list, you might add: “Have you posted any statements about these events on any internet site?” Of course, you will have conducted a search engine and, perhaps, database query on the witness as part of your preparation for the deposition, so you’ll know if he or she is lying.
- “Did you read any witness statements or depositions, listen to any recorded statements, look at any diagrams or photographs, or did somebody else read you any statements before the deposition?” Okay, this is more than one question, but I had to combined them here to meet the 10-question quota imposed by the title of this article.
- “Tell me everything you did to get ready for this deposition.” The answer can lead you to what the witness or opponent perceives as his or her weak spots, including areas of which you were unaware. After all, it is only natural to prepare for the hardest questions or topics. Remember to find out the specific documents reviewed, places visited and persons met with by the witness.
- “Was anyone else present when you met with your lawyer?” If a third-party was present during the meeting, the witness may have waived the attorney-client privilege.
- “How did you find your attorney [doctor/chiropractor/therapist/expert]?” This can lead to interesting prior legal issues, lawsuits or self-interest/improper involvement on the part of opposing counsel.
- “Do you have your driver’s license with you?” If so, ask to see it. Take down the personal information and, if appropriate, read it into the record.
That’s my “top 10″ — or so — general questions designed to uncover dirt. Remember, there’s more to taking a deposition than impeachment. For more depo tips, read Preparing Your Client For Deposition in Lit Tip Of The Week.
For honing overall deposition skills, I recommend two courses: the National Institute for Trial Advocacy “Deposition Skills” Training (17+ hours) and Robert Musante’s “Take A Killer Deposition” (full-day course). I’ve taken both courses and received nothing in return for these recommendations.
About Newdorf Legal – a California
Business Litigation Law Firm
Newdorf Legal is the go-to small firm for big problems. When business executives and public officials face complex legal challenges, they turn to David Newdorf for advice and representation. The firm’s lawyers have significant experience in the private and public sectors handling high-profile litigation. Newdorf Legal provides business and public entity clients expert advice and representation in:
- business litigation
- commercial disputes
- California breach of contract lawsuits
- business torts/interference with contract
- real property litigation
- joint venture/partnership issues
- investor lawsuits
- fraud and other civil actions
For a free copy of our informative brochure, “The Top 10 Business Litigation Mistakes . . . and how to avoid them,” contact Newdorf Legal.
For all of your litigation questions, contact Newdorf Legal, a San Francisco business litigation law firm.